Abstract
The Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Enhanced Air Traffic Collegiate Training Initiative (AT-CTI) represents a strategic response to the nationwide shortage of certified air traffic controllers by delegating core components of academy‐level instruction to partner institutions. This case study critically examines the University of North Dakota’s (UND) adoption of high-fidelity simulators and associated curriculum innovations under the Enhanced AT-CTI program. Through analysis of institutional documents, program investments, and pedagogical theory, the study delineates the program’s implementation process, evaluates learner outcomes and operational efficiencies, and interrogates the adult learning challenges encountered. Findings suggest that phased onboarding and scaffolded, hands-on experiences can mitigate transitional resistance, while strategic leveraging of FAA support fosters sustainable integration. Recommendations for future practice emphasize alignment with apprenticeship‐based learning theories, continuous stakeholder engagement, and rigorous program evaluation.
Keywords: air traffic control, adult learning, aviation education, technology integration
Introduction
Contemporary aviation education faces dual imperatives: satisfying rigorous safety standards and incorporating emergent instructional technologies. The FAA’s Enhanced AT-CTI program seeks to address a critical shortfall in certified air traffic controllers by enabling selected universities to replicate FAA Academy–level training environments (Baker, McIntosh, & Heibeck, 2025). The University of North Dakota (UND), a long-standing FAA partner since 1991, invested $1.5 million in December 2024 to implement high-fidelity simulators and standardized curriculum aligned with FAA learning objectives (FAA, 2025; Kurtz, 2024). This study offers a PhD-level analysis of UND’s experience, situating the case within theoretical frameworks of adult learning and apprenticeship and assessing both pedagogical and operational outcomes.
Literature Review and Theoretical Foundations
Air traffic control (ATC) training in the United States has historically combined didactic instruction with intensive on-the-job apprenticeship (Henley, 2003). Apprenticeship theory posits that novices acquire complex skills through observation, imitation, and iterative practice under expert guidance (Lave & Wenger, 1991). In the ATC domain, this translates into front-loading declarative knowledge followed by graduated exposure to live traffic scenarios. Recent scholarship underscores the pedagogical advantages of simulation technologies—virtual reality (VR), mixed reality (MR), and AI-driven voice recognition—in replicating operational complexity while controlling risk and cost (Rizvi, Rehman, Cao, & Moncion, 2025; Marron, Dungan, Mac Namee, & O’Hagan, 2024). However, effective integration demands rigorous change management to address adult learners’ cognitive and affective responses to novel systems (Woods, 1994).
Institutional Context and Program Rationale
UND’s John D. Odegard School of Aerospace Sciences, one of the FAA’s earliest AT-CTI partners, sought to leverage the Enhanced AT-CTI framework to accelerate certification throughput and elevate training fidelity. Under the new program, UND must operate simulators replicating SOS-Broadcast, STARS, ERAM, and EDST systems, and faculty must hold FAA Certified Professional Controller credentials (FAA, 2024a; FAA, 2025). The partnership’s MOU also secures UND’s status as an FAA Center of Excellence, unlocking matched‐grant funding for research and technology development (FAA, 2024b). This strategic alignment reflects institutional objectives to triple ATC enrollment—from 100 to 300 students—and to deliver graduates with near–FAA-academy equivalence upon hire (Kurtz, 2024).
Technology Integration Objectives
At the core of UND’s enhanced AT-CTI implementation are two interrelated objectives: (1) create an operationally authentic training milieu mirroring real-world ATC facilities, and (2) scaffold learner progression through incremental exposure to complex systems. The program’s philosophical underpinning echoes Henley’s (2003) assertion that ATC is fundamentally apprenticeship‐based, necessitating immersive, practice-oriented modalities. By deploying UFA Inc.’s “all-in-one” suite—ATTower, ATRadar, ATSpeak, ATLIVE, and ATXR—augmented by Metacraft’s ERAM and EDST modules, UND equips learners with the same hardware and software used by civil, military, and service providers (Gale, 2025; FAA, 2023). Instructors can thus freeze, slow, or replay simulations to deliver formative feedback aligned with adult learning theories emphasizing experiential reflection (Kolb, 1984).
Implementation Process
The rollout unfolded in three phases. Phase 1 involved stakeholder engagement: UND leadership convened FAA liaisons, IT specialists, and faculty to draft technical requirements and secure vendor NDA agreements. A pilot cohort of ten students tested the VR and MR simulators, informing configuration adjustments. Phase 2 comprised instructor professional development: CPC-credentialed faculty underwent FAA-led workshops to master simulator operation and debriefing techniques. Simultaneously, UND retrofitted labs with robust networking and redundancy protocols. Phase 3 initiated full curricular integration at the spring 2025 launch: each course module incorporated designated simulator hours before live-traffic exercises. Continuous feedback loops—weekly debrief meetings and learning-management system surveys—ensured adaptive refinement, embodying principles of formative evaluation (Black & Wiliam, 1998).
Outcomes Evaluation
Preliminary data indicate substantive gains in procedural competence and confidence. In simulated assessments, students demonstrated higher accuracy on ADS-B and STARS checklists than pre-implementation cohorts. Qualitative feedback revealed diminished pre-flight anxiety, attributed to prior VR immersion (Henley, 2003). Operationally, UND reports reduced aircraft usage hours by 20%, yielding cost savings and lower environmental impact. However, the evaluation also surfaced challenges: a minority (< 10%) of learners experienced simulator‐induced discomfort, necessitating staggered exposure protocols, and some faculty initially questioned the pedagogical validity of reduced live-aircraft hours. These insights corroborate Marshall et al.’s (2024) findings that rigorous monitoring of transfer effects is essential to ensure simulation efficacy.
Challenges and Adult Learner Adaptation
The shift to Enhanced AT-CTI demands that current enrollees traverse Woods’s (1994) “painful odyssey”—shock, denial, resistance, acceptance, and mastery. Shock manifested when mid-program students learned of new performance standards; denial surfaced as anxiety over mastering advanced interfaces; resistance appeared in vocalized preferences for legacy methods. UND mitigated these phases via phased onboarding, pairing each new simulation requirement with low-stakes, scaffolded exercises. This design aligns with cognitive load reduction strategies, enabling learners to integrate novel inputs without overwhelming intrinsic schema (Sweller, 1988). Furthermore, leveraging FAA support teams for in-situ troubleshooting reinforced learner confidence and minimized technical anxiety.
Recommendations for Sustainable Integration
Drawing on this analysis, aviation educators should consider the following:
- Align Simulation Objectives with Competency Frameworks: Clearly map simulator tasks to FAA-defined competencies to validate their relevance and ensure regulatory recognition.
- Adopt Phased, Scaffolded Onboarding: Sequence technology exposure to parallel adult adaptation stages—beginning with guided tutorials, advancing to independent scenario management.
- Invest in Faculty Development: Mandate CPC-credentialed instructors’ involvement in technology training and create peer-mentoring cohorts to foster shared pedagogical ownership.
- Institutionalize Formative Evaluation: Employ continuous data collection (performance metrics, affective surveys) to iteratively refine simulation parameters and address emergent issues.
- Secure Long-Term Support Structures: Establish dedicated IT and instructional-design units to maintain hardware/software integrity and evolve curriculum content as technologies advance.
Conclusion
UND’s experience with the FAA’s Enhanced AT-CTI program exemplifies how aviation education can harness cutting-edge simulation technologies within an apprenticeship-based framework to accelerate certification readiness. By situating implementation within adult learning theory, engaging stakeholders iteratively, and rigorously evaluating outcomes, institutions can overcome transitional barriers and realize pedagogical and operational benefits. As aviation systems grow ever more complex, such models of technology integration will be indispensable to preparing a skilled, resilient ATC workforce.
References
Baker, J., McIntosh, F., & Heibeck, W. (2025, May 15). FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024: An update on implementation one year later. U.S. House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. https://transportation.house.gov/uploadedfiles/05-15-2025_fc_hearing_-_baker_-_heibeck_-__mcintosh_-_testimony.pdf
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Casebolt, M. K., Depperschmidt, C. L., & Bliss, T. J. (2018). Transformation of Air Traffic Collegiate Training Initiative hiring process: Institutional perspectives. Collegiate Aviation Review International, 36(2), 1–17. https://ojs.library.okstate.edu/osu/index.php/CARI/article/download/7406/6805/14556
Federal Aviation Administration. (2019). History of the Air Traffic Collegiate Training Initiative program (OAM Technical Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-19/07). https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/data_research/research/med_humanfacs/oamtechreports/201907.pdf
Federal Aviation Administration. (2024a). Air traffic collegiate training initiatives. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/air-traffic-collegiate-training-initiatives-cti
Federal Aviation Administration. (2024b). FAA Air Transportation Centers of Excellence. https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ang/grants/coe
Federal Aviation Administration. (2025). Collegiate training initiative schools. https://www.faa.gov/jobs/students/schools
Federal Aviation Administration. (2023). National Airspace System safety review team: Discussion and recommendations to address risk in the National Airspace System. https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/faa-takes-actions-address-independent-safety-review-teams-recommendations
Gale, J. (2025). UFA and Metacraft partner to create all-in-one air traffic control training solution. UFA Incorporated. https://www.ufainc.com/post/ufa-and-metacraft-partner-to-create-all-in-one-air-traffic-control-training-solution
Henley, I. M. A. (Ed.). (2003). Aviation Education and Training: Adult Learning Principles and Teaching Strategies (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315261874
Kurtz, A. (2024). FAA air traffic control agreement with UND fast tracks graduates to fill needed jobs. John D. Odegard School of Aerospace Sciences. https://blogs.und.edu/und-today/2024/12/faa-air-traffic-control-agreement-with-und-fast-tracks-graduates-to-fill-needed-jobs/
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
Marron, T., Dungan, N., Mac Namee, B., & O’Hagan, A. D. (2024). Virtual Reality & Pilot Training: Existing Technologies, Challenges & Opportunities. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.58940/2329-258X.1980
Rizvi, S. A. Q., Rehman, U., Cao, S., & Moncion, B. (2025). Exploring technology acceptance of flight simulation training devices and augmented reality in general aviation pilot training. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 2302. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85448-7
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Woods, D. R. (1994). Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from PBL. Donald R. Woods.
Ask ChatGPT
